 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Starting at the Netroots Nation Conference on July 18th, 2008, progressive online activists ("the Netroots") have organized to craft their own political platform in typical Netroots fashion: democratically and transparently, engaging as many people as possible online.
The final platform can be found below. It was submitted to Michael Yaki, the head of the Obama Campaign's platform committee, as well as through the Obama campaign's "Listening to America" process. A conference call between members of the Netroots Platform committee and Mr. Yaki was held on August 22nd - you can find a complete account of the call here.
Check out our coverage on ABCNews and Wired. Also, a press release is available. For more information, please contact info [at] mixedink [dot] com.
The Netroots Platform Committee
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Table of contents
 | | |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The American Dream: prosperity, liberty, security for all. The American Dream begins with every American's right to be healthy, educated, and to live in a safe community and a clean environment. We believe vibrant economy is built with American jobs, well-paid productive workers, innovation, and the entrepreneurial spirit. We believe responsibility, honesty, and compassion are fundamental to a successful nation and that efficient government, effective public investments, and fiscal responsibility serve our citizens best. We believe protecting personal liberty begins with the right of every citizen to enjoy their full civil liberties with equal access to opportunity and justice, We believe in the values of freedom, fairness, and respect. We believe the cornerstone of democracy is honest elections, transparent government and a deep commitment to our nations' Constitution and Bill of Rights. We believe leadership with global cooperation is the best way to secure peace and acting on environmental challenges strengthens our nation and protects the Earth. We believe the power of the United States must be used honestly and wisely. We believe America's promise of prosperity, liberty and security belongs to all Americans and that our nation's strength lies in a shared commitment to these ideals.  |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  See how this was created | | >> back to top
 | | | |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
It is our fundamental belief that the American economy should be an economy that
is democratically managed for the benefit of all the American people, not for the
pursuit of corporate, government, or global power. We have seen in recent years
that when government abdicates its responsibility to regulate the economy, chaos
ensues and the working class suffers as a result. We believe in free enterprise and
we support the entrepreneurial spirit of the American people, but we believe that
such enterprise flourishes only when the economy is responsibly managed by
government on behalf of the people. In light of this fundamental belief, we propose
the following steps to lift our economy out of its current recession:
- Recognizing that our budget deficit contributes to the devaluation of the
dollar and thus to inflation, we call for responsible budgeting by our
government. Government can and should pay for programs as it goes without
accounting or political trickery; we cannot continue to fund programs with
deficit spending.
- To work toward a balanced budget and ensure that needed programs do not
suffer.
- To refocus our military budget to pay down the National Debt, fund the
inevitable Social Security issue, and/or scientific exploration and education.
- Like our budget deficit, our trade deficit contributes to the devaluation of the
dollar and inflation. We therefore call for a renegotiation of all free trade
agreements, especially the North American and Central American Free Trade
Agreements (NAFTA and CAFTA). All trade agreements should be sensitive to
both domestic and foreign economic needs, to the rights of workers here and
abroad.
- The current home mortgage and banking crises have occurred because
government failed to adequately regulate the banking system. We call for a
more efficient, streamlined form of regulation for financial institutions,
investor rights, and financial product and commodities trading, and to ensure
no one single institution is too integrated to fail at the taxpayer's expense.
- To encourage competition and prevent any government-backed institution
from becoming too large to fail at taxpayers' expense, we call for a
government-engineered break-up of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
- We encourage and empower the GAO other regulators to ensure each
government agency is running, efficiently and transparently. Specifically, we
empower the Government Accounting Standards Board to enforce
government financial accounting and reporting.
- To ensure a strong economy, government must work to curtail corporate
crime and impropriety. Among the many steps that must be taken to curtail
corporate crime, we call for an end to loopholes that allow corporations to
move to offshore tax havens and avoid their taxes; for better regulation of the
pension system to ensure retirement security; and for a ban on government
contracting to corporate criminals.
- We believe in the fundamental principle that much should be expected from
those to whom much has been given, and we have seen in recent years that
the "trickle-down" theory of economics in which it is argued that tax cuts to
the wealthy will trickle down for the benefit of all is a false theory.
- We recognize that our energy and education policies are integral to a bright
economic future for America. We call for an energy policy based on
renewable resources to lower costs for Americans and create new jobs. We
further call for an educational policy that deemphasizes standardized testing
and that is sensitive to inequities experienced by underprivileged and
minority students.
- We respect the role of working women in our economy, and we call for
economic policy that recognizes the vital role these women play. We call for
the ratification of a federal Equal Rights Amendment to ensure, among other
things, that women are given equal pay for equal work.
- We recognize the contribution made to our economy by undocumented
workers, and we reject policies that force them into hidden slave-labor. We
call for humane immigration policies that make it easier for those of other
lands to pursue the American dream, as many of our own ancestors did. We
call for legal normalization of undocumented workers' status and a path to
citizenship for those who have contributed to our prosperity.
These steps are vital to creating a people-powered economy, but they are the means
to an end and not an end unto themselves. The ultimate goal of our economic policy
must be to create an economy that works for all Americans, and government should
pursue any policy that would work toward that end, no matter how bold or
innovative. Boldness and innovation have helped to turn us into an economic
superpower, and only that same boldness and innovation will preserve our
economic standing for future generations.  |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  See how this was created | | >> back to top
 | | | |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Human Rights and Justice
We believe that every citizen regardless of their sex, race, national origin, religion,
age, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability or economic status is entitled to
equal protection under the law, to equal access to the benefits of our political and
economic system, and to equal access to our courts. We support efforts to integrate
individuals with handicaps into the community and workplace. We repudiate the
racist and/or violent tendencies of extremist groups. We support a path to
citizenship for all immigrants. We support the inherent right to privacy for lawabiding
citizens, and the right of individuals to control their own bodies and medical
decisions. Constant vigilance is necessary to protect our constitutional rights against
efforts to undermine or ignore them.
Restore our American Constitution and Balances of Power in Government
Our Constitution is the fundamental framework of our democracy and freedoms. It
must be upheld. We must actively secure government of the People, by the People,
and for the People.
We believe that the will of the people is expressed through multiple venues,
including but not limited to direct democracy, use of our first amendment rights,
and the election of representatives to our legislative, executive, and judicial
branches.
We resolve to restore the balance of powers between the legislative, executive, and
judicial branches, in particular, all Congressional prerogatives such as declarations
of war, the power of the purse, challenges to executive overreaching with signing
statements and executive orders, enforcement of Congressional subpoenas, and
impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors. We believe that the role of the
Congress to advise and consent to the executive branch is a necessary activity, not to
be abridged by the theory of a unitary executive.
We believe that the balance and checks on the power of these branches is vital to the
continued peace and stability of our nation. We believe that the checks on all of
these branches by the people themselves through speech, activism, and voting is a
vital right and responsibility.
Restore our Constitutional Rights and Demand Accountability
We resolve to restore our constitutional rights including dissent, free speech,
assembly, habeas corpus, privacy, due process of law, and equal protection. To this
end, we resolve to put an end to government practices and to repeal or substantially
amend laws (including the Patriot Act, the FISA Amendments law and the Military
Commissions Act), executive orders, and executive signing statements that attempt
to legitimize warrantless surveillance on Americans, the use of secret evidence in
military courts, torture, illegal rendition and imprisonment of U.S. citizens and
others, and arbitrary racial and religious profiling. We resolve to replace these with
laws that reaffirm our fundamental rights and hold accountable all parties who
violate those rights.
We resolve to remove from law, policy and practice of the United States the
redefinition of torture by the Bush administration. We resolve to support full and
complete and independent and open investigations into those creating the new
definitions of torture, those who made them the law, policy and practice of the
United States, and those who carried out the torture, from the highest to the lowest
levels, and to support such criminal charges as are recommended. We resolve to
suport a full and complete and open accounting of all those held in Us custody and
all those rendered and their treatment, since January 21, 2001. We resolve to
support the re-signing of the Treaty of the World court by the President of the
United States. We resolve to support the closing of the Guantanamo Bay Detention
Facility and just a fair and speedy criminal trials for those still held without charge.
We resolve to support the swift finding of safe havens for those who have been
found innocent whose countries will not allow them to return or who fear torture if
they are returned.
Get FISA Right
We resolve to repeal or substantially amend the FISA Amendments Act, which
threatens Fourth Amendment and other fundamental rights and to replace the FISA
Amendments Act with a law that restores fundamental rights and holds all parties
accountable who violate those rights.
We resolve to conduct a full investigation of illegal government surveillance
programs, make public the legal opinions that justified them, and hold accountable
those who ordered illegal warrantless surveillance.
We resolve to restore the rule of law and end unchecked unitary executive power by
bringing to justice all corporate entities, government agencies, and persons who
violated the Fourth Amendment and other fundamental rights.
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender/Transsexual (LGBT) Equality
We support the hate crimes bill, known as the Matthew Shepard Act, as approved in
the 110th Congress and will renew the effort to pass into legislation a hate crimes
bill in order to protect more LGBT Americans from bias-motivated violence.
We support non-discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and public
accommodation for LGTB people.
We support repealing the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, as well as Article 125 of the
Unified Military Justice Code, to allow all LGBT Americans to proudly defend our
country.
We believe in the separation of Church and State. While different religions set
different criteria about the sex of people that they marry, the government should
not practice discrimination based upon the sex of the intended spouses in the
issuance of marriage licenses.
We support the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and explicitly require
the Federal Government to consider as married all couples legitimately married or
joined in a civil union in a jurisdiction that recognizes these unions.
We believe that the government should recognize all civil unions and domestic
partnerships equally.
We believe in a person's freedom to choose how to live his or her life, including the
freedom of gender identity and expression and will pass legislation to protect that
freedom.
We believe in a country in which all children can have a learning environment in
schools safe of harassment and bullying and will pass legislation to that effect.
We support protecting all families and their children equally and explicitly
acknowledge the adoption rights of same-sex couples. We will pass legislation to
that effect.
Democracy and Civil Rights for Puerto Rico
We believe that the disenfranchisement of Puerto Ricans must be a matter of
concern for all Americans, since we cherish the ideals of liberty, equality, justice and
the inalienable right to choose those who govern us. We believe that it is time to put
an end to the gross deficiency of our American democracy in Puerto Rico, which
contains the largest group of disenfranchised voters under the American flag, by
working towards a non-colonial, non-territorial and fully democratic solution to the
110-year-old dilemma of Puerto Rican colonialism. We believe that the People of
Puerto Rico must determine, themselves, their own political future and ultimate
relationship with the United States. However, it is incumbent upon the American
government to set up a framework to create a genuine and transparent process for
self-determination that will be true to the best traditions of democracy. Therefore,
we resolve to work with the Puerto Rican People in promoting a deliberative, open
and unbiased process toward political self-determination.
We resolve to continue the work started by the White House Task Force on Puerto
Rico, as established by President Clinton and continued under President Bush, in
order to support the President's role in bringing about a constitutionally viable and
binding process for the political self-determination for the people of Puerto Rico.
We resolve to support Congress in a renewed effort to pass existing and/or new
legislation aimed at fostering a constitutionally viable, binding and ultimate process
of political self-determination for the people of Puerto Rico.
We resolve to support the roles of the Judicial Branch and of the Justice Department
in denouncing civil rights violations against our American citizens in Puerto Rico.  |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  See how this was created | | >> back to top
 | | | |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
While much attention has been focused on administrative details, there is more than
one road to achieving a fair healthcare system for America. No one structure can
claim to be the only right way.
However, there are certain tests that must be met by any true reform.
They are:
- Universality and Reliability. A successful and fair reform must cover
everyone, regardless of health status, age, economic status or place of
residence. This system must be reliably available to anyone in the United
States.
- Equality. Everyone must be covered for the same standard of care. Any
differentiation into one program for the poor and a different program for the
rich leads inexorably to decay of programs perceived as serving the poor and
disadvantaged. Health care providers will be provided increased incentives
for working in primary care as well as in underserved communities and
populations.
- Comprehensiveness. All needed care covered, including inpatient and
outpatient medical, dental, vision, mental health, physical and occupational
therapies, hospice care, rehabilitation services and complementary therapies
scientifically judged to be effective.
- Broad-based financing mechanism for affordability. The financing
mechanism must be broad-based and appropriately progressive, or at a
minimum, not regressive. It must also not be based on discriminatory pricing
based on pre-existing conditions.
- Cost-Effectiveness and Efficiency. The structure of the reformed system
must be designed to minimize spending on administrative processes and
maximize the portion of spending devoted to actual provision of care.
- Usability, Transparency, and Patients' Rights. The reformed system must
provide ease of access and simplicity both for patient and provider, including
electronic medical records systems which protect patient privacy. The
mechanisms of obtaining care and treatment shall be transparently clear to
all. Patients must have a "Bill of Rights" protecting their rights, including
refusal of care.
- Emphasis on Prevention. To the extent that decisions must be made on the
allocation of scarce resources, high priority should be given to prevention
and early detection of disease and incentives designed to maximize patient
use of preventive services, while minimizing preventable disease and
disability. This includes public health policy based on sound scientific
guidelines following guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
- Long-term Care and End-of-life Care. We support the availability of quality
long-term and end-of-life care for our most vulnerable citizens. This care
should be provided on a sliding scale rate system so that the families in
greatest need are not forced to destitution by the costs of care.
- Privacy of Medical Decisions. Decisions around medical issues shall reside
with the patient and the doctor, and any other person the patient permits to
be involved, except in cases with impact on the public health at large (such as
infectious disease transmission). All other parties will remain outside of the
decision process. Privacy will include keeping abortion "safe, legal, and rare"
(President Bill Clinton) through protecting women's right to a safe and legal
abortion, and facilitating the reduction of abortion through noncoercive
means such as family planning, sex education, adoption, maternity leave,
parenting classes, and reducing poverty.
- Freedom of Choice. Americans should have freedom of choice among care
providers. They should also be freed from undue burden or coercion by the
government, e.g., purchase of health insurance for adults should not be
mandated, or made a condition of employment.
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  See how this was created | | >> back to top
 | | | |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The foreign policy of the United States should reflect our highest ideals of freedom,
liberty, justice, and democracy. In the past, we have often relied too much on our
military strength instead of our ethical principles. US military intervention in other
countries is often seen by the people in those countries as insensitive and bullying,
which has made it easier for extremists to rally support thus placing America in far
greater danger.
Real security is best advanced by ameliorating global poverty and other problems
that afflict people worldwide, upholding human rights, adhering to international
law, cooperating with our allies who support these principles, and honestly
negotiating mutually-satisfactory solutions with our adversaries.
We call for a new US foreign policy. Specifically we call for the United States to:
- Expeditiously end the war in Iraq and bring our troops safely home.
- Renounce pre-emptive or preventive wars and instead cooperate with our
allies and honestly negotiate with our adversaries.
- Support pending international treaties (the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty,
the International Criminal Court, the land mine treaty, cluster bomb treaty,
and banning weapons in space), reaffirm our support of previously ratified
international treaties (Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty), and seek to negotiate
other treaties that will eliminate weapons and build confidence in nonmilitary
solutions to conflicts.
- Support international capacities for prevention of armed conflict, for human
rights monitoring, and for multilateral rapid responses to conflict and crisis
via the United Nations.
- Renounce the first use of nuclear weapons and reaffirm that these weapons
would only be used in retaliation after a nuclear attack initiated by another
country. End efforts to develop new "useable" nuclear weapons.
- Work to end the proliferation of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.
Specifically, expand funding for the Nunn-Lugar program to guard nuclear
weapons and materials more securely and destroy existing nuclear stockpiles
and production facilities, adhere to the provisions of the Nuclear Non-
Proliferation Treaty which calls for all countries with nuclear weapons to
reduce and eliminate their nuclear weapons, adhere to chemical and
biological weapons protocols to reduce and eliminate these weapons, and
support verification measures and enhanced inspection of all weapons
facilities.
- Ban the sale and transfer of arms to regions of conflict and to regimes
involved in human rights abuses.
- Support programs that promote peaceful conflict resolution, democracy,
human rights, equality, sustainable development, and civilian-led political
transition and reconstruction programs.
- Increase foreign aid to democratic countries that work to end poverty and
misery. End foreign aid to regimes that abuse human rights or block
democratic reform and use this money to support nonprofit international aid
organizations.
- Support nonpartisan, nonviolent intervention as practiced by groups like the
Nonviolent Peace Force and Peace Brigades International.
- End all financial contracts with private companies that provide soldiers
(mercenaries). Ensure that all armed forces personnel adhere to the Uniform
Military Code of Justice.
- Ban all lobbying by defense contractors. Bolster the resources of the
Inspector General to reduce corruption in defense contracts.
- Reduce the number of US military bases around the world, reduce the
number of people serving in the armed forces, slow the development of new
weapons systems, and reduce the defense budget to reflect a truly defensive
force. Use the savings to promote peaceful conflict resolution, democracy,
and sustainable development.
- Increase health and education benefits for veterans to ensure they are taken
care of and compensated for the toll taken by their service to our country.
- Support communication and commerce between Americans and people in
other countries to increase empathy and understanding, reduce prejudice
and fear, and build mutual interdependence.
- Renounce and repudiate torture under all circumstances.
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  See how this was created | | >> back to top
 | | | |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Our society is inexorably tied to conventional energy. It governs the way we live, the
foods we eat and the economy upon which we depend. Today, we see an increasing
urgency to find sustainable alternatives that will provide us and our environment
with a cleaner way of life. Ten years ago would we have expected to see energy and
environmental issues discussed on the Senate floor, on the tips of Presidential
candidates' tongues, or on the daily pages of mass media outlets. We must use this
momentum to drive the change that will lead us towards more sustainable energy in
all facets of our systems:
- Electricity (currently driven by dirty coal and questionably safe nuclear
power).
- Transportation of humans and goods (currently driven by imported
gasoline) and
- Heating in the northern climes (currently dominated by cleaner yet pricevolatile
natural gas).
While a lofty yet achievable goal, the United States must commit to producing 100%
of our electricity from cheap, clean renewable energy sources, like solar and wind,
within 10 years. This will not only depend on investing in technologies that are
commercially available today, but also must include substantial increases in
investment for research and development for more efficient renewables and
electricity storage. Without such R&D to make renewables more cost-competitive
through efficient designs and government subsidies, renewable electric technologies
will most likely always lag behind the cheaper yet dirtier alternative, coal. Of
particular note, we should invest in a pilot plant for space solar power, and
continued developmental work in all forms of fusion energy (magnetic containment,
laser-powered inertial confinement, and inertial electrostatic fusion).
Over 30% of conventional fuels we use are devoted to transporting ourselves and
the goods we depend upon. Our transportation network is based on the faulty
premise that we have enough clean and inexpensive fuel to drive it. We must
increase train transportation and reduce the distance from which our goods and
foods come. We must also embark on a major effort to develop mass transportation
- reducing private vehicle use by 30% within 10 years. And the private vehicles that
do remain in existence must become much more efficient - we need to double or
even triple the efficiency of all private vehicles.
Our throwaway society is unsustainable. Every good that we send to the landfill
embodies energy that is lost when thrown away. To send the right signals,
producers of products and our built environment need to be designed with the
whole life cycle in mind. We need to replace our current cradle-to-grave disposable
mindset with cradle-to-cradle design that will be healthy for all the children of all
species for all time. When the price reflects the recycling and/or disposal costs,
producers have an incentive to design for recycling and design out toxics. This idea
is sweeping the nation. More than a dozen states - and New York City - have passed
producer take-back recycling laws for electronics such as computers and TVs. Most
have passed since May 2007.
The green economy has arrived and should be embraced. The United States should
commit to rebooting our economy using the needs of a sustainable green economy
to create jobs and develop new industries. We should commit to a Green New Deal
to support energy efficiency and build renewable energy capacity to mitigate the
negative effects of climate change and the economic consequences that will
undoubtedly arise with expensive and dirty fuels.  |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  See how this was created | | >> back to top
 | | | |
| |  See how this was created | | >> back to top
 | | | |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Our commitment to education is among our greatest obligations to our children, and
it is a challenge we take seriously. It is our goal to provide children with an
education that will broaden their horizons, expand their minds, and help them grow
as individuals.
We believe that every student should have access to safe, supportive schools with
certified, well-paid teachers, regardless of their socioeconomic status. We believe
that education should be flexible enough to meet individual students' unique needs
and learning styles. We think parents and communities should play a role in
education, because success cannot be achieved in school alone. We recognize
teaching as one of the most challenging and vital jobs in our country, and we believe
teachers should be paid fairly and rewarded for their accomplishments. We think
that primary and secondary education should prepare students both personally and
academically to enter college and that a high quality public college education should
be affordable for every student.
To accomplish these goals, we must invest more in our schools, teachers, and
students:
- We will enable teachers to give each student the individual academic and
personal attention he or she needs to succeed, by reducing class sizes and
providing adequate paid non-teaching time to reflect the many
responsibilities faced by today's teachers beyond actual pedagogy.
- We will expand robust extended-day programs to support working families
and to provide students with extra help and diverse learning opportunities.
- We will seek out, develop, and reward programs that aim to build
community, provide individualized support for students, and encourage
parental involvement.
- We believe that immigration has brought some of our country's best talent,
and we pledge to support English language learners with strong bilingual
education and English as a second language programs.
- We will improve the way professional development services are delivered to
professional educators, to reflect the understanding that best practices in
professional development require not only theoretical instruction, but also
ample opportunities to collaborate with colleagues in common planning and
interactive reflection on teaching practices.
We will replace the failed No Child Left Behind program, which posits standardized
test scores as the sole measure of learning, with a more comprehensive system of
accountability that considers students' personal development and academic
preparation more three-dimensionally. Rather than punishing schools, students, and
teachers that need the most help, we will make available all the resources they need
to improve.
We will continue to emphasize literacy, social studies, and the arts while also
prioritizing math and science. When students in the United States fall behind their
peers around the world in math and science, we fail in our promise to prepare them
to succeed in a globalized world. We will reconsider the curricula offered in these
areas to ensure students have access to the best tools and the greatest
opportunities.
We will invest in better financial aid options and increase debt forgiveness
programs for students who pursue careers in public service.
Working to improve our educational system is one of our nation's greatest
challenges, and we are prepared to work hard and invest significantly to uphold this
obligation to our children and ensure them the opportunities they deserve.  |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  See how this was created | | >> back to top
 | | | |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
American Prosperity through Science and Technology
In the past, government funding for scientific research has yielded innovations that
have improved the landscape of American life, technologies like the Internet, digital
photography, bar codes, Global Positioning System technology, laser surgery, and
chemotherapy. At one time, educational competition with the Soviets fostered the
creativity that put a man on the moon. Today, we face a new set of challenges,
including energy security, HIV/AIDS, and climate change. Yet, the United States is
losing its scientific dominance. Among industrialized nations, our country's scores
on international science and math tests rank in the bottom third and bottom fifth,
respectively. Over the last three decades, federal funding for the physical,
mathematical and engineering sciences has declined at a time when other countries
are substantially increasing their own research budgets.
We believe that federally funded scientific research should play an important role in
advancing science and technology in the classroom and in the lab.
The 21st century tools of technology and telecommunications have unleashed the
forces of globalization on a previously unimagined scale. They have flattened
communications and labor markets and have contributed to a period of
unprecedented innovation, making us more productive, connected global citizens.
We believe that by maximizing the power of technology, we can strengthen the
quality and affordability of our health care, advance climate-friendly energy
development and deployment, improve education throughout the country, become a
spacefaring society, and ensure that America remains the world's leader in
technology. Through marshalling our exploding base of knowledge in biotechnology
and related fields, we will support 'efficient medicine' to drastically reduce the costs
of health care - and human suffering - by preventing disease and by improving
health outcomes. To facilitate a more effective Science & Technology policy, and
foster America's global competitiveness, we must educate more scientists and
engineers than ever before.
We believe that we should invest in the Sciences. We support doubling federal
funding for basic research, changing the posture of our federal government from
being one of the most anti-science administrations in American history to one that
embraces science and technology. This will foster homegrown innovation, help
ensure the competitiveness of US technology-based businesses, and ensure that 21st
century jobs can and will grow in America. It is often federally supported basic
research that has generated the innovation to create markets and drive economic
growth. For example, one recent report demonstrated how federally supported
research in fiber optics and lasers helped spur the telecommunications revolution.
We resolve to make the R&D Tax Credit Permanent. We will invest in a skilled
research and development workforce and technology infrastructure here in America
so that American workers and communities will benefit. We will make the Research
and Development tax credit permanent so that firms can rely on it when making
decisions to invest in domestic R&D over multi-year timeframes.
Restoring Scientific Integrity to Federal Policy Making
Scientific knowledge and its successful applications have played a large role in
making the United States of America a powerful nation and its citizens increasingly
prosperous and healthy. The challenges that face the United States in the twentyfirst
century can only be met if this tradition is honored and sustained.
To that end, the U.S. government must adhere to high standards of scientific
integrity in forming and implementing its policies. Breaches of this principle have
damaged the public good and the international leadership of the United States.
The United States government must adhere to high standards of scientific integrity
in forming and implementing its policies on crucial issues such as climate change. To
meet its obligation to serve the public interest, the government must have reliable
scientific work and advice at its disposal, and provide the public with reliable
scientific information. This requires the government to provide the resources
needed to carry out its scientific missions, and to create an environment that
respects the scientific method. To that end, scientists should have the freedoms and
protections they need to fulfill their public responsibilities.
We believe that federal government science should be depoliticized.
- We believe that scientists should have freedoms and protections that enable
them to fulfill their responsibilities to the public, including legislation that
strengthens the rights of federal employees who blew the whistle on fraud
and corruption. Career civil servants should perform press release reviews of
government-funded scientists' data--not partisan propagandists from any
side of the aisle.
- We believe that government should be more transparent, so politicized
science can be detected and disavowed. The policy-making process should
presume that government information is public knowledge, to be withheld
only when necessary, and scientific results or analysis used in promulgating
any policy, guidance, or regulation should be available to the public.
- We believe that the regulatory process should be fundamentally reformed, to
protect the important role of independent science in that process. A balance
must be struck between the executive brand priorities and federal agency
independence. Policies and executive orders which tightened centralized
control of federal agencies under the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) and the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) should be
reversed, restoring power to commence rule making to the agency heads and
ensuring that OMB review of agency guidance documents does not permit
inappropriate political review of scientific documents. The President and
Congress should have testimony from authorities in science and technology
fields, and the testimony should not be filtered by administrators.
- We believe that scientists should have better mechanisms for communicating
high-quality advice to government officials, so policy makers have accurate
and robust information on which to base their decisions. The scientific
advisory committee system should be reformed to insure that selection of
advisory committee membership is fully transparent and based solely upon
experience and technical qualifications. We believe that well informed
representatives must have free and unbiased access to the best in the
scientific and technology fields. In order to provide legislators with timely
technical information, the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) should be
reinstated by appropriating enough funds to create a successful office and a
widely respected scientist should be appointed to lead it. We believe that the
National Academies of Science should provide such access to the
representatives to any member of congress, the judiciary, or the
administration at government expense. Because science and technology
issues are so closely intertwined with other national priorities, including
health, energy policy, and national security, the science advisor acting as an
assistant to the president must be widely respected scientist. The position of
Science Advisor to the President should be a cabinet-level job.
- We believe that Congress and the executive branch should ensure the
consistent enforcement of existing regulations and statutes in order to avoid
politicizing the scientific process. We believe that the monitoring and
enforcement of these laws should be depoliticized. In addition, executive
branch agencies should compile an easily searchable database of federal
environmental-monitoring programs.
Space Policy
- The United States, in cooperation with other nations and private industry,
must reduce the cost of reliable access to space in order to move humanity
towards a spacefaring society.
Currently, the space industry is a $251 Billion dollar industry. Beyond pure
economic benefits, space provides invaluable resources in the form of GPS,
weather forecasting, new technologies, and so on. Further development and
expansion of society into space, such that the average person can directly
interact with space, will provide a range of benefits, from new resources and
economic opportunities, enhance our understanding of ourselves and our
universe, and engender a new era of peaceful cooperation with other
countries. Key to these benefits is a massive reduction in the cost of reliable
transport to space. We can best accomplish such breakthroughs by catalyzing
innovation by private space entrepreneurs (using such policy tools as large
scale prizes or guaranteed launch payments), and by working in close
peaceful partnership with other spacefaring nations.
- Space and NASA are vital to dealing with the intertwined problems of energy
independence and climate change, including both monitoring and finding
solutions.
NASA collects more data about Earths environment than any other single
entity on our planet. NASA has also historically incubated new technologies
that are vital to clean renewable energy such as solar cells, batteries, and
lightweight composite materials. The resource of space solar power may
even offer us a long term, large-scale solution to the problem of energy
independence. However, under the Bush Administration, the Earth was
removed from NASAs mission statement and the findings of NASAs leading
climate change researchers were censored. Going forward, NASAs Mission to
Planet Earth must be fully funded, and the NASA must be explicitly called
upon play a central role in our nations understanding and mitigation of
climate change.
- The President should re-establish the National Aeronautics & Space Council.
In addition, the National Aeronautics & Space Council needs to have direct
access to the president.
Vital to our future in space is the re-establishment of the National
Aeronautics & Space Council. To often, our policy, especially with regards to
space policy, has been disjointed, and inarticulate. A range of issues, related
to space, could finally be addressed in a comprehensive manner, that insures
everyone who has a stake in space policy will have a voice. Issues like the
International Trafficking and Arms Regulation, the establishment of large
scale space prizes, and a working group on Space Solar Power are all
examples of what this council would handle. However, such a council is only
as effective if the president chooses to use such a council, and therefore it
must have direct access to the president.
Broadband Infrastructure
We support the expansion of the nation's broadband infrastructure through the
establishment of a broadband superhighway system, along with guaranteed access
to broadband Internet connectivity.
Educational and enterprise innovation will thrive in an atmosphere of universal
broadband access - laying the infrastructure for an explosive increase in American
competitiveness in the information age.  |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  See how this was created | | >> back to top
 | | | |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
One of America's great philosophers and educators, John Dewey, once wrote, "A
democracy is more than a form of government; it is primarily a mode of associated
living, of conjoint communicated experience." Nothing could be more true, and it is
imperative that we, the people of the United States, in our commitment to
grassroots participation in our own democratic society find and utilize all the means
of communication at our disposal to assure a collective experience reflective of our
complex and diverse associations.
Political platforms rarely, if ever, address the importance of our technology in
constructing perceptions of who we are and how we relate to one another. The
content of our transactions is protected by the First Amendment, and the context of
our messages are bounded by landmark decisions of the Supreme Court. These
principles will always require the vigilant attention of the American people and
their elected representatives, however the various media that facilitate
communication play an important role in determining who has access to the
conversation and what bias or biases exist in the transactions. Each medium
requires its own understanding, possesses its own rules, and offers a different
relationship between authority and audience. Any platform worth its own weight in
the 21st century must pay equal attention to the communication environment itself,
and the various properties and grammar of individual media, as much as it does the
traditional pillars of content and context.
We believe that the importance of all forms of media, be they institutional or citizencentered,
require different approaches in a democracy. The institutional media,
controlled by corporate interests and public trusts, play an important role in
reaching the broader citizenry with great resources and the traditional trust
endowed in the 4th Estate. Assuring their continued service to the citizen and to the
democracy requires regulatory balance that controls the commercial and private
interest and its reach, while encouraging and promoting the American
entrepreneurial spirit that has marked our technological evolution from the
telegraph to the World Wide Web. In the same regard, citizen-centered media have
provided a depth and breadth to our conjoint communicated experience never
before seen. This new possibility requires a new vigilance. The ability of all citizens
to equally participate in this national conversation, shaping and constructing the
very society in which we live, is at this moment an unrealized dream. We believe
that equal access to these forms of media must be guaranteed and a commitment by
government to developing and providing this access via technological, economic,
and legislative means is paramount.
Two important aspects to this platform require immediate attention. The first is a
commitment to reforming the institutional media environment via stricter
regulation and a shift from a pro-business policy to a pro-competition policy. The
second is a commitment to maintaining an open flow of information in citizencentered
media environments via protective legislation and the improvement of
relevant infrastructure to facilitate greater participation in these forms.
Reform of the institutional media environment requires a commitment to rolling
back failed aspects of the Telecommunication Act of 1996, particularly those
allowing for greater consolidation of media ownership. Legislation must be enacted
to limit the market share available to media owners to pre-1996 standards. In
addition, the monopoly elements of telecommunication markets must be addressed
via investment in technological solutions, as well as a commitment to open and
competitive markets. Prioritizing investment in wireless technology eliminates the
expensive and monopolistic wires and cables, which until recently have all but
eliminated all competition from media markets.
Competition within markets will assure consumers greater flexibility and lower
rates, while opening possibilities for citizens to participate in the control and
direction of the media in their communities. Policymakers must legislate ownership
limits that promote diversity and competition, and antitrust bodies must block
further consolidation that undermines them. In addition, policymakers must define
high-speed Internet access, and enact legislation to provide nondiscriminatory
access to information networks. This is an issue of Net Neutrality.
The Internet must be protected as a democratic communication environment first
and a commercial environment second. Legislation providing free, open, and neutral
access to the Internet is job one in this respect. An private effort to control or limit
access to this environment must be prevented, and measures dedicated to this
principle must be written into law. This is a First Amendment issue, and as such
must be framed with respect to the Constitution. A national broadband policy that
predicates on increased competition, world class bandwidth access and quality, and
fair pricing must be set in motion as a commitment to progressive, democratic
modernization. Community Internet, or municipal broadband, commitments bring
increased access and participation to rural and underserved areas and foster
greater participation in the national discourse. Dedicated wireless investments
would accomplish this goal, while simultaneously offering a more open,
entrepreneurial, and democratic ownership structure within local environments.
The importance of this platform is underlined again by Dewey in his statement,
"Communication alone can create a great community. Our Babel is not one of
tongues but of the signs and symbols without which shared experience is
impossible." Maintaining the channels of our national communication, and making a
commitment to their perpetual improvement, assures that the construction of a
unifying set of signs and symbols takes place, through which community emerges
out of Babel. Access to these channels by the widest possible citizenry is
representative of our national values and the great diversity of experience and belief
that defines our greatness as a people.  |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  See how this was created | | >> back to top
 | | | |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
We believe that the government should support a food supply that is sustainable
both environmentally and economically. We believe that the level of control exerted
by large multinational corporations over agriculture and our food supply is
inconsistent with both the free market and social welfare. Strong enforcement of
anti-trust laws is a critical step to decentralizing and strengthening our food supply.
We call for enforcement of existing regulations to protect the environment and
address food safety. We also call for a recognition that many of the problems that
the regulations seek to address are caused by large, industrial agriculture practices.
Small, sustainable farms and food processors do not cause these problems and
should not be burdened with unnecessary and expensive regulations. Small, local
farmers are stewards of the land and water and provide safe and nutritious food,
and the regulatory system should address them independently of the centralized,
industrial agriculture system.
Economic Fairness
- We oppose NAFTA, CAFTA and the other various free trade agreements
(FTAs) as they undermine our nation's economy. They might benefit the
multinational corporations but the rest of us aren't feeling too much trickling
down as we watch our jobs go to Mexico.
- Our government must enforce the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and the Packers &
Stockyards Act. Monopolies are not good for capitalism. We resent the high
amount of consolidation in so many industries and we look to an Obama
administration to break them up.
- We want to see executives who hire undocumented workers to face severe
penalties. They are not only taking away jobs from Americans, they are also
often violating human rights by hiring the most helpless class of workers.
Undocumented workers who are abused on the job cannot sue, often they
cannot speak English, and they work under the threat of deportation. Those
who abuse them and profit from their hard work deserve to be penalized for
it.
- Enormous, industrial farms should be held accountable for the
environmental damage they cause. It is not fair that we allow a huge farm to
pollute drinking water with fertilizer and/or manure runoff and then
taxpayers pay to clean the water to make it drinkable. That is, in essence, a
tax subsidy freely given (but never recognized) to factory farms. The EPA
must be funded appropriately so that the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts can
be enforced (and both acts should be stiffened as appropriate to hold
polluters accountable so that tax payers don't end up with the bill for their
pollution).
- Congress should pass the "packer ban," a law prohibiting meat processors
from owning livestock. The meatpacking industry is highly, highly
consolidated and farmers already struggle to sell their animals for fair prices.
When the enormous meatpackers also own livestock (and thus compete with
the farmers), the system becomes even more monopolistic and unfair to the
farmers.
Local Food
The government must actively promote sustainable local food systems for a number
of reasons: to combat global warming, to ensure better food safety, to provide access
to healthy food for all Americans, and to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. Some
methods the government should use to do this include:
- Significantly increase mandatory funding for the Community Food Projects
competitive grant program (ideally from $5 million to $30 million). This
program is an incredible bargain for taxpayers as it promotes local food
without increasing the size of government bureaucracy, allows for local
control over programs, and establishes local food programs that are
financially independent after their initial period receiving federal grant
money.
- Increase funding for the USDA's Risk Management Agency's Community
Outreach Partnership Program far beyond its previous level of $8. 3 million
before recent budget cuts. This program helps out the nation's most at-risk
farmers and populations and produces tangible benefits in the form of
increased community food security and healthier local food systems.
- Fund schools so they may build gardens, add kitchen facilities, hire kitchen
staff, and purchase food from local farms. Make sure that schools do not have
to teach to a test (as they do under No Child Left Behind) in such a way that
they cannot offer any elective curricula, such as a gardening program.
Food Safety
Part of national security is being able to trust that food from stores and restaurants
are safe. Too often now, the burden of food safety is put on the consumer (i.e. it's OK
if the store sells you beef with E. coli and it's your job to cook it thoroughly) and this
is not OK. Food safety needs to begin on the farm.
- Studies show that we can drastically reduce E. coli in beef by changing the
cows' diet from grain to alfalfa 3 days before slaughter. Americans die from E.
coli 0157:H7 in ground beef; there is no reason we should not be taking this
crucial step to save American lives.
- Another way to improve safety is to slow down the lines in meatpacking
plants. Meatpackers increase line speed to increase profits, but they do so at
the expense of worker safety and food safety. E. coli does not get into the
meat without a mistake occurring during processing, either contaminating
the meat from manure on the cow's hide or in the gut. Decreasing line speed
will decrease mistakes.
- As Democrats, we should NOT support the ridiculous National Animal ID
System as it does NOT improve food safety. By implementing an expensive,
invasive tracking system without making the other needed changes in our
food system, we will not do anything at all to improve our safety. All NAIS
does do is invade privacy and push small farmers out of business.
- We should regulate what animals are allowed to eat. Currently, even though
we know that feeding animal remains to animals causes mad cow, we still
tolerate several loopholes in our system. For example, cows can eat pigs and
pigs can eat cows. Calves often eat cow blood. We need to examine this and
close the remaining loopholes.
Additionally, there are other things American agricultural animals eat that
are banned in Europe with good reason (like chickens and arsenic). We must
examine those and ban substances that should not be in the food chain.
- Individual farmers should be allowed to test their cows for mad cow if they
so choose. Currently, farmers who wish to test every cow for mad cow in
order to do business with Japan are not permitted to do so. This is insane.
Why are we preventing our farmers from increasing the safety of our food
supply?
- We need to adopt policies that actively promote small farms, farmers'
markets, farm to school programs, and other local, decentralized food
systems. We are sick of seeing outbreaks like this latest Salmonella outbreak,
in which over 1000 people were affected across the country. When we
promote local food systems, we also help citizens avoid the food safety issues
that arise from our centralized, industrialized system.
Food Labeling
Consumers should have the right to know what is in their food so they may make
educated choices about what to eat. We propose the following:
- Label foods that contain genetically-modified ingredients. Consumers are
generally unaware that 70% of food in America contains GMOs and they have
a right to know.
- Label added sugars in foods. Often a food (for example, blueberry yogurt)
will contain both natural sugars (in the blueberries and milk) and added
sugars (i.e. sugar or high fructose corn syrup). Currently the label shows only
the total amount of sugar, which is not always helpful to a consumer trying to
make healthy food choices. When eating blueberries or milk, one eats sugar
but he or she also gets fiber, protein, and important vitamins at the same
time. When one eats added sugar, he or she gets no nutritional benefit.
Establishing a recommended amount of 10 teaspoons of added sugar per day
for someone who eats a 2000 calorie diet and labeling added sugars would
help consumers understand the impact of their food choices more effectively.
- Label all milk that comes from cows treated with rBGH (recombinant bovine
growth hormone). Also, allow dairies to label products that are rBGH-free.
Some consumers wish to avoid milk from treated cows because such milk
contains significantly higher levels of a hormone known as IGF-1 (potentially
linked to cancer) than milk from untreated cows. Others wish to avoid milk
from treated cows because they feel the hormone is inhumane to the animals.
Consumers have a right to know how their milk was produced.
- Regulate and limit call outs and health claims made on foods. The current
trend of labeling cookies that are nutritionally worthless as "whole grain" or
"trans fat free" aims to mislead consumers that such products are healthy.
Other foods make even bolder claims that they can support or promote a
particular body structure or function (i.e. supports respiratory function),
leading consumers to purchase food for medicinal benefits when in fact the
foods were never required to prove the claims on the labels are true.
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  See how this was created | | >> back to top
 |
|  |
|